4.7 Article

A WISE VIEW OF A NEARBY SUPERCLUSTER A2199

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 752, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/64

关键词

galaxies: clusters: individual (Abell 2199); galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. Smithsonian Institution
  2. INFN [PD51]
  3. MIUR [2008NR3EBK_003]
  4. Cottrell College Science Award from the Research Corporation
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) data covering the entire region (similar to 130 deg(2)) of the A2199 supercluster at z = 0.03 to study the mid-infrared (MIR) properties of supercluster galaxies. We identify an MIR star-forming sequence in the WISE [3.4]-[12] color-12 mu m luminosity diagram, consisting of late-type, star-forming galaxies. At a fixed star formation rate, the MIR-detected galaxies at 22 mu m or 12 mu m tend to be more metal-rich and to have higher surface brightness than those without MIR detection. Using these MIR-detected galaxies, we construct the IR luminosity function (LF) and investigate its environmental dependence. Both total IR (TIR) and 12 mu m LFs are dominated by late-type, star-forming galaxies. The contribution of active galactic nucleus host galaxies increases with both TIR and 12 mu m luminosities. The contribution of early-type galaxies to the 12 mu m LFs increases with decreasing luminosity. The faint-end slope of the TIR LFs does not change with environment, but the change of faint-end slope in the 12 mu m LFs with the environment is significant: there is a steeper faint-end slope in the cluster core than in the cluster outskirts. This steepening results primarily from the increasing contribution of early-type galaxies toward the cluster. These galaxies are passively evolving, and contain old stellar populations with weak MIR emission from the circumstellar dust around asymptotic giant branch stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据