4.7 Article

A UNIVERSAL NEUTRAL GAS PROFILE FOR NEARBY DISK GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 756, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/183

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: ISM

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 881]
  2. NSF [1140031]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1140031] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on sensitive CO measurements from HERACLES and Hi data from THINGS, we show that the azimuthally averaged radial distribution of the neutral gas surface density (Sigma(HI)+Sigma(H2)) in 33 nearby spiral galaxies exhibits a well-constrained universal exponential distribution beyond 0.2 x r(25) (inside of which the scatter is large) with less than a factor of two scatter out to two optical radii r(25). Scaling the radius to r25 and the total gas surface density to the surface density at the transition radius, i.e., where Sigma(HI) and Sigma(H2) are equal, as well as removing galaxies that are interacting with their environment, yields a tightly constrained exponential fit with average scale length 0.61 +/- 0.06 r(25). In this case, the scatter reduces to less than 40% across the optical disks (and remains below a factor of two at larger radii). We show that the tight exponential distribution of neutral gas implies that the total neutral gas mass of nearby disk galaxies depends primarily on the size of the stellar disk (influenced to some degree by the great variability of Sigma(H2) inside 0.2 x r(25)). The derived prescription predicts the total gas mass in our sub-sample of 17 non-interacting disk galaxies to within a factor of two. Given the short timescale over which star formation depletes the H-2 content of these galaxies and the large range of r(25) in our sample, there appears to be some mechanism leading to these largely self-similar radial gas distributions in nearby disk galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据