4.0 Article

Characterization of the human prostaglandin H synthase 1 gene (PTGS1): exclusion by genetic linkage analysis as a second modifier gene in familial thrombosis

期刊

BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 519-531

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001721-200209000-00007

关键词

human; prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 1; gene; base sequence; exons; introns; short tandem repeats; markers; repetitive sequences; single nuclecotide polymorphism; venous thrombosis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 46703] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic evidence from a large Vermont kindred indicates that an unknown gene promotes thrombosis when inherited in conjunction with type I protein C deficiency. Cyclooxygenase-1 [prostaglandin H synthase 1 gene (PTGS1)] was tested as a plausible candidate for the unknown gene because of its role in primary hemostasis. The complete sequence of PTGS1 (25638 nucleotides) was determined from a 37 kb human genomic cosmid clone to characterize intronic regions and subsequently to allow the search for mutations by direct sequencing of genomic DNA. Northern blot analysis confirms usage of a newly described distal poly-adenylation signal. Short tandem repeat (STR) sequences found in intron 2 and the 3' flanking region were developed as new genetic markers for PTGS1. The position of PTGS1 was refined on the CHLC chromosome 9 linkage map using the new markers scored in four Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Human families and multipoint linkage analysis. Direct sequencing of DNA from members of the Vermont kindred led to the discovery of two new single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that give rise to non-conservative amino acid changes in the signal peptide (Arg(8) to Trp and Pro(17) to Leu) of cyclooxygenase-1. Linkage analysis of the SNP and STR markers indicated that PTGS1 is not the interacting gene associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis in the Vermont kindred. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据