4.7 Article

EX Lupi FROM QUIESCENCE TO OUTBURST: EXPLORING THE LTE APPROACH IN MODELING BLENDED H2O AND OH MID-INFRARED EMISSION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 745, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/90

关键词

circumstellar matter; molecular processes; stars: activity; stars: individual: (EX Lupi); stars: pre-main sequence; stars: variables: T Tauri, Herbig Ae/Be

资金

  1. new Star and Planet Formation group at the ETH Zurich

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comparison of archival Spitzer spectra of the strongly variable T Tauri EX Lupi, observed before and during its 2008 outburst. We analyze the mid-infrared emission from gas-phase molecules thought to originate in a circumstellar disk. In quiescence the emission shows a forest of H2O lines, highly excited OH lines, and the Q branches of the organics C2H2, HCN, and CO2, similar to the emission observed toward several T Tauri systems. The outburst emission shows instead remarkable changes: H2O and OH line fluxes increase, new OH, H-2, and H I transitions are detected, and organics are no longer seen. We adopt a simple model of a single-temperature slab of gas in local thermal equilibrium, a common approach for molecular analyses of Spitzer spectra, and derive the excitation temperature, column density, and emitting area of H2O and OH. We show how model results strongly depend on the selection of emission lines fitted and how this is likely to be attributed to a combination of non-thermal excitation and multiple emission components. Using H2O lines that can be approximated as thermalized to a single temperature, our results are consistent with a column density decrease in outburst while the emitting area of warm gas increases. A rotation diagram analysis suggests that the OH emission can be explained with two temperature components, which remarkably increase in column density in outburst. The relative change of H2O and OH emission suggests a key role for UV radiation in the disk surface chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据