4.0 Article

Comparative prevalence, multiplicity, and progression of spontaneous and vinyl carbamate-induced liver lesions in five strains of male mice

期刊

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 599-605

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01926230290105776

关键词

hepatocarcinogenesis; tumor progression; neonatal mouse model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The overall and age-specific prevalences and multiplicities of spontaneous and chemically induced hepatocellular neoplasia were compared among male B6D2F1, B6C3F1, C3H (C3H/HeNCrl MTV-), B6CF1, and C57BL/6 (C57BL/6NCrl) mice following a single intraperitoneal injection of 0.03 muM vinyl carbamate (VC)/g body weight or vehicle alone at 15 days of age. Additional groups of B6C3F1, C3H, and C57BL/6 males received 0.15 muM VC/g body weight at 15 days of age. For male B6D2F1, B6C3F1, C3H, B6CF1, and C57BL/6 mice, the estimated overall prevalences (and multiplicities) of hepatocellular adenomas or carcinomas in vehicle controls were 14.1% (0.19), 12.3% (0.15), 8.2% (0.10), 7.2% (0.09), and 2.4% (0.02), respectively. The analogous estimates in the low-dose group were 59.2% (1.19), 72.9% (4.07), 48.6% (1.99), 22.8% (0.29), and 43.9% (0.82). Analogous estimates for B6C3F1, C3H, and C57BL/6 mice in the high-dose group were 45.3% (4.29), 59.7% (6.63), and 46.8% (1.74), respectively. Age-specific multiplicity estimates suggested a progression from altered hepatocellular foci (AHF) to hepatocellular neoplasms. Further evidence of progression was provided by the temporal occurrence of hepatocellular adenomas before carcinomas, and the apparent origination of carcinomas within adenomas. Pulmonary metastases were observed in many of the mice with hepatocellular carcinomas. These findings confirm previous observations of strain differences in liver neoplasm response, suggest a progressive development from AHF to adenomas, and ultimately to carcinomas, and show sensitivity to VC-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in all 5 strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据