4.7 Article

STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCIES AND LIFETIMES OF GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUDS IN THE MILKY WAY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 729, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/133

关键词

galaxies: star clusters: general; ISM: bubbles; ISM: clouds; stars: formation

资金

  1. Canada Research Chair program
  2. NSERC of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use a sample of the 13 most luminous WMAP Galactic free-free sources, responsible for 33% of the free-free emission of the Milky Way, to investigate star formation. The sample contains 40 star-forming complexes; we combine this sample with giant molecular cloud (GMC) catalogs in the literature to identify the host GMCs of 32 of the complexes. We estimate the star formation efficiency is an element of(GMC) and star formation rate per free-fall time is an element of(ff). We find that is an element of(GMC) ranges from 0.002 to 0.2, with an ionizing luminosity-weighted average (Q) = 0.08, compared to the Galactic average approximate to 0.005. Turning to the star formation rate per free-fall time, we find values that range up to is an element of(ff) tau(ff) . (M) over dot(*)/M-GMC approximate to 1. Weighting by ionizing luminosity, we find an average of (Q) = 0.14-0.24 depending on the estimate of the age of the system. Once again, this is much larger than the Galaxy-wide average value is an element of(ff) = 0.006. We show that the lifetimes of GMCs at the mean mass found in our sample is 27 +/- 12 Myr, a bit less than three free-fall times. The GMCs hosting the most luminous clusters are being disrupted by those clusters. Accordingly, we interpret the range in is an element of(ff) as the result of a time-variable star formation rate; the rate of star formation increases with the age of the host molecular cloud, until the stars disrupt the cloud. These results are inconsistent with the notion that the star formation rate in Milky Way GMCs is determined by the properties of supersonic turbulence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据