4.7 Article

WARM H2O AND OH DISK EMISSION IN V1331 Cyg

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 738, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/112

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; stars: formation; stars: individual (V1331 Cyg); stars: pre-main sequence; techniques: radial velocities; techniques: spectroscopic

资金

  1. W. M. Keck Foundation
  2. NASA [NNH10A0061]
  3. University of California Lab [09-LR-01-118057-GRAJ]
  4. NSF [AST-0909188]
  5. Naval Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present high-resolution (R = 24,000) L-band spectra of the young intermediate-mass star V1331 Cyg obtained with NIRSPEC on the Keck II telescope. The spectra show strong, rich emission from water and OH that likely arises from the warm surface region of the circumstellar disk. We explore the use of the new BT2 water line list in fitting the spectra, and we find that it does a much better job than the well-known HITRAN water line list in the observed wavelength range and for the warm temperatures probed by our data. By comparing the observed spectra with synthetic disk emission models, we find that the water and OH emission lines have similar widths (FWHM similar or equal to 18 km s(-1)). If the line widths are set by disk rotation, the OH and water emission lines probe a similar range of disk radii in this source. The water and OH emission are consistent with thermal emission for both components at a temperature similar to 1500 K. The column densities of the emitting water and OH are large, similar to 10(21) cm(-2) and similar to 10(20) cm(-2), respectively. Such a high column density of water is more than adequate to shield the disk midplane from external UV irradiation in the event of complete dust settling out of the disk atmosphere, enabling chemical synthesis to continue in the midplane despite a harsh external UV environment. The large OH-to-water ratio is similar to expectations for UV irradiated disks, although the large OH column density is less easily accounted for.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据