4.7 Article

OGLE-III DETECTION OF THE ANOMALOUS GALACTIC BULGE RED GIANT BRANCH BUMP: EVIDENCE OF ENHANCED HELIUM ENRICHMENT

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 730, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/118

关键词

Galaxy: bulge

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0757888]
  2. European Research Council under European Community [246678]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0757888] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measure the red giant branch bump (RGBB) of the Galactic bulge, the most metal-rich RGBB ever detected. The RGBB luminosity function peaks at the expected brightness, but its number density is very low relative to Galactic globular cluster calibrations, implying the Galactic bulge has a higher helium enrichment parameter Delta Y/Delta Z >= 4.0 for Y similar to 0.35 rather than the standard 2.0 with Y = 0.27, which we suggest may be a common feature of galactic spheroids. The RGBB is (0.71 +/- 0.02) mag fainter than the red clump ( RC) in I toward the densest stellar regions imaged by the OGLE-III Galactic bulge photometric survey, (vertical bar l vertical bar <= 4, 2 less than or similar to vertical bar b vertical bar <= 4). The number density of RGBB stars is (12.7 +/- 2.0)% that of RC stars. The brightness dispersion of the RGBB is significantly lower than that of the RC, a result that is difficult to explain as the RGBB luminosity is known to vary significantly with metallicity. Sight lines that have two RCs have two RGBBs with similar properties to one another, an expected outcome if the Milky Way's bulge is X-shaped. We also find preliminary evidence of the Galactic bulge asymptotic giant branch bump, at a brightness of similar to 1.06 mag brighter than the RC in I and with a number density similar to 1.5% that of the RC. Accounting for the RGBB has a small effect on the best-fit parameters of the RC, shifting its best-fit peak brightness and reducing its brightness dispersion by similar to 0.015 mag each.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据