4.4 Article

Control of mycobacterial replication in human macrophages: Roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 70, 期 9, 页码 4961-4967

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4961-4967.2002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular persistence of mycobacteria may result from an intricate balance between bacterial replication and signaling events leading to antimicrobial macrophage activities. Using human monocyte-derived macrophages, we investigated the relevance of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation for the growth control of Mycobacterium avium isolates differing in their abilities to multiply intracellularly. The highly replicative smooth transparent morphotype of M. avium strain 2151 induced significantly less p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation than the smooth opaque morphotype of the same strain, which was gradually eliminated from macrophage cultures. Inhibition of the p38 pathway by highly specific inhibitors did not significantly affect mycobacterial replication within macrophages, regardless of the in vitro virulence of the M. avium strain. However, repression of the ERK1/2 pathway further enhanced intracellular growth of highly replicative M. avium strains, although it did not increase survival of the poorly replicating M. avium isolate. Inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway resulted in decreased tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-alpha) secretion irrespective of the virulence of the M. avium isolate used for infection, revealing that TNF-alpha could have been only partially responsible for the control of intracellular M. avium growth. In conclusion, ERK1/2- and TNF-alpha-independent pathways are sufficient to limit intramacrophage growth of less-virulent M. avium strains, but early ERK1/2 activation in infected macrophages is. critically involved in controlling the growth of highly replicative M. avium strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据