4.7 Article

THE CO-TO-H2 CONVERSION FACTOR FROM INFRARED DUST EMISSION ACROSS THE LOCAL GROUP

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 737, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/12

关键词

dust, extinction; galaxies: ISM; ISM: clouds; ISM: molecules; Local Group

资金

  1. Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF-51258.01-A]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  3. Spitzer [1314022]
  4. NSF [AST-0838178, NSF-AST0955836]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22740127, 22540250, 21253003] Funding Source: KAKEN
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0955836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We estimate the conversion factor relating CO emission to H-2 mass, alpha(CO), in five Local Group galaxies that span approximately an order of magnitude in metallicity-M 31, M33, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), NGC 6822, and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). We model the dust mass along the line of sight from infrared (IR) emission and then solve for the aCO that best allows a single gas-to-dust ratio (delta(GDR)) to describe each system. This approach remains sensitive to CO-dark envelopes H-2 surrounding molecular clouds. In M 31, M 33, and the LMC we find alpha(CO) approximate to 3- 9M(circle dot) pc(-2) (K km s(-1))(-1), consistent with the Milky Way value within the uncertainties. The two lowest metallicity galaxies in our sample, NGC 6822 and the SMC (12 + log(O/H) approximate to 8.2 and 8.0), exhibit a much higher alpha(CO). Our best estimates are alpha(NGC6822)(CO) approximate to 30 M-circle dot pc(-2) (K km s(-1))(-1) and alpha(SMC)(CO) approximate to 70 M-circle dot pc(-2) (K km s(-1))(-1). These results are consistent with the conversion factor becoming a strong function of metallicity around 12 + log(O/H) approximate to 8.4-8.2. We favor an interpretation where decreased dust shielding leads to the dominance of CO-free envelopes around molecular clouds below this metallicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据