4.7 Article

GLOBAL GENERAL RELATIVISTIC MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATIONS OF BLACK HOLE ACCRETION FLOWS: A CONVERGENCE STUDY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 744, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/187

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); methods: numerical

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY 02-05155, AST 07-09246]
  2. NASA [NNX10AD03G]
  3. Richard and Margaret Romano Professorial scholarship
  4. NESS [NNX10AL24H]
  5. NASA [NNX10AD03G, 135909] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations of non-radiative, magnetized disks are widely used to model accreting black holes. We have performed a convergence study of GRMHD models computed with HARM3D. The models span a factor of four in linear resolution, from 96 x 96 x 64 to 384 x 384 x 256. We consider three diagnostics of convergence: (1) dimensionless shell-averaged quantities such as plasma beta; (2) the azimuthal correlation length of fluid variables; and (3) synthetic spectra of the source including synchrotron emission, absorption, and Compton scattering. Shell-averaged temperature is, except for the lowest resolution run, nearly independent of resolution; shell-averaged plasma beta decreases steadily with resolution but shows signs of convergence. The azimuthal correlation lengths of density, internal energy, and temperature decrease steadily with resolution but show signs of convergence. In contrast, the azimuthal correlation length of magnetic field decreases nearly linearly with grid size. We argue by analogy with local models, however, that convergence should be achieved with another factor of two in resolution. Synthetic spectra are, except for the lowest resolution run, nearly independent of resolution. The convergence behavior is consistent with that of higher physical resolution local model (shearing box) calculations and with the recent non-relativistic global convergence studies of Hawley et al.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据