4.5 Article

Characterisation of the cysteine protease ER60 in transgenic Schistosoma mansoni larvae

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 1219-1224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00092-9

关键词

proteinase; cysteine protease ER60; larval schistosomes; green fluorescent protein (GFP); particle bombardment; transgenic parasite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteinases have been found to play important roles in parasites. They are involved in developmental processes and facilitate invasion of host tissues as well as the digestion of host molecules for nutrition. The cysteine protease ER60 from Schistosoma mansoni, originally characterised in adults to be expressed in excretory organs, was analysed in larval stages. Transcripts were found in miracidia, in vitro generated mother sporocysts and cercariae. After cloning the promoter and terminator of the ER60 gene, a transformation vector was constructed containing the green fluorescent protein reporter gene flanked by the regulatory elements. The ER60-green fluorescent protein vector was used for transfection experiments of COS-7 cells demonstrating the functionality of the promoter in the heterologous system. To analyse the expression pattern of ER60-green fluorescent protein in larval S. mansoni, in vitro generated mother sporocysts were transformed by particle bombardment, a method which allows gene transfer into schistosomes. Molecular analyses demonstrated transcription and translation of the transgene. Furthermore, confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed ER60-induced green fluorescent protein fluorescence within the larvae. Inside primary sporocysts, tissue-specific activity was localised in the gland cells, protonephridia and several cytons. These results suggest that ER60 is expressed in the ES system of larvae and, amongst other functions, may play a role in penetration and migration processes. (C) 2002 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据