4.5 Article

Acute vascular rejection is associated with up-regulation of vitronectin receptor (αvβ3), increased expression of tissue factor, and activation of the extracellular matrix metalloproteinase induction system

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 983-989

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-2498(02)00408-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A cascade of inflammatory reactions characterize acute vascular rejection after heart transplantation. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that acute vascular rejection is associated with up-regulation of vitronectin receptor (alphavbeta3), increased expression of tissue factor, and activation of the extracellular matrix metalloproteinase induction system. Methods: Acute vascular rejection developed in 14 heart transplant recipients within 2 weeks of transplantation, confirmed by immunofluorescence (AVR group). We compared these patients with 10 transplant recipients who had no evidence of acute vascular rejection or peritransplant ischemic injury (control group). We evaluated endomyocardial. biopsy specimens for alphavbeta3, tissue factor, and extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN). Results: Compared with the control group, the AVR group demonstrated evidence of significantly increased expression of alphavbeta3 (1.9-fold, p < 0.001), tissue factor (1.8-fold, p < 0.001), and EMMPRIN (1.5-fold, p < 0.001). All patients in the AVR group received plasmapheresis; 11 of 14 patients had evidence of ischemic necrosis on biopsy specimens, and 3 of 14 patients experienced hemodynamic compromise and graft dysfunction and died within 3 weeks of transplant. Another patient died at 10 months after transplant. Conclusions: Acute vascular rejection is associated with up-regulation of alphavbeta3, tissue factor, and activation of the matrix metalloproteinase induction system, which may contribute to the lethal morbidity associated with this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据