4.5 Article

Effects of sibutramine on ventricular dimensions and heart valves in obese patients during weight reduction

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 144, 期 3, 页码 508-515

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.124403

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Obesity enhances hemodynamic alterations that predispose to a subsequent increase in left ventricular (LV) wall stress leading to LV hypertrophy. In obese subjects, weight reduction regresses LV mass (LVM), regardless of blood pressure. Sibutramine can increase blood pressure and heart rate, which may attenuate the reductions in LVM associated with weight loss. Methods Outpatients (n = 184, age 18-65 y, body mass index greater than or equal to30 to <40 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to 6 months of once daily double-blind treatment with sibutramine 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo. IV dimensions, status and function of the valves, weight loss, blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiogram were assessed. Results For end point data sets, the mean 51) LVM index (LVM/height) changes were -3.0 +/- 11.9 g/m for placebo (n = 56), -4.4 +/- 10.7 g/m for sibutramine 10 mg (n = 6 1), and -4.3 +/- 10.9 g/m for sibutramine 20 mg (n 56). The reductions observed in the sibutramine groups were statistically significant compared with baseline (P < .01), but pairwise comparison results with placebo were not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall status of the cardiac valves. A statistically significant greater weight loss was found in patients on both doses of sibutramine compared with placebo (P < .001). No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed in respect to blood pressure and electrocardiographic intervals, but a statistically significant increase in pulse rate (7 beats/min) was noted for patients with sibutramine treatment. Conclusion A 6-month treatment with sibutramine does not affect ventricular dimensions, heart valves, and electrocardiogram variables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据