4.7 Article

A COMPLETE SAMPLE OF ULTRALUMINOUS X-RAY SOURCE HOST GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 741, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/49

关键词

galaxies: general; surveys; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: galaxies; X-rays: general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One hundred seven ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) with 0.3-10.0 keV luminosities in excess of 10(39) erg s(-1) are identified in a complete sample of 127 nearby galaxies. The sample includes all galaxies within 14.5 Mpc above the completeness limits of both the Uppsala Galaxy Catalogue and the Infrared Astronomical Satellite survey. The galaxy sample spans all Hubble types, a four-decade range in mass, 7.5 < log(M/M-circle dot) < 11.4, and in star formation rate, 0.0002 < SFR(M-circle dot yr(-1)) <= 3.6. ULXs are detected in this sample at rates of one per 3.2 x 10(10) M-circle dot, one per similar to 0.5 M-circle dot yr(-1) star formation rate, and one per 57 Mpc(3) corresponding to a luminosity density of similar to 2 x 10(37) erg s(-1) Mpc(-3). At these rates we estimate as many as 19 additional ULXs remain undetected in fainter dwarf galaxies within the survey volume. An estimated 14 objects, or 13%, of the 107 ULX candidates are expected to be background sources. The differential ULX luminosity function shows a power-law slope alpha similar to -0.8 to -2.0 with an exponential cutoff at similar to 20 x 10(39) erg s(-1) with precise values depending on the model and on whether the ULX luminosities are estimated from their observed numbers of counts or, for a subset of candidates, from their spectral shapes. Extrapolating the observed luminosity function predicts at most one very luminous ULX, L-X similar to 10(41) erg s(-1), within a distance as small as 100 Mpc. The luminosity distribution of ULXs within the local universe cannot account for the recent claims of luminosities in excess of 2 x 10(41) erg s(-1), requiring a new population class to explain these extreme objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据