4.7 Article

A NEW CEPHEID DISTANCE TO THE GIANT SPIRAL M101 BASED ON IMAGE SUBTRACTION OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS OBSERVATIONS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 733, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/124

关键词

distance scale; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: individual (M101); stars: variables: Cepheids; stars: variables: general; techniques: image processing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We accurately determine a new Cepheid distance to M101 (NGC 5457) using archival Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/Advanced Camera for Surveys V and I time series photometry of two fields within the galaxy. We make a slight modification to the ISIS image subtraction package to obtain optimal differential light curves from HST data. We discovered 827 Cepheids with periods between 3 and 80 days, the largest extragalactic sample of Cepheids observed with HST by a factor of two. With this large Cepheid sample, we find that the relative distance of M101 from the Large Magellanic Cloud is Delta mu(LMC) = 10.63 +/- 0.04 (random) +/- 0.06 (systematic) mag. If we use the geometrically determined maser distance to NGC 4258 as our distance anchor, the distance modulus of M101 is mu(0) = 29.04 +/- 0.05 (random) +/- 0.18 (systematic) mag or D = 6.4 +/- 0.2 (random) +/- 0.5 (systematic) Mpc. The uncertainty is dominated by the maser distance estimate (+/- 0.15 mag), which should improve over the next few years. We determine a steep metallicity dependence, gamma, for our Cepheid sample through two methods, yielding gamma = -0.80 +/- 0.21 (random) +/- 0.06 (systematic) mag dex(-1) and gamma = -0.72(-0.25)(+0.22) (random) +/- 0.06 (systematic) mag dex(-1). We see marginal evidence for variations in theWesenheit period-luminosity relation slope as a function of deprojected galactocentric radius. We also use the tip of the red giant branch method to independently determine the distance modulus to M101 of mu(0) = 29.05 +/- 0.06 (random) +/- 0.12 (systematic) mag.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据