4.6 Article

Chronic arsenic-exposed human prostate epithelial cells exhibit stable arsenic tolerance: Mechanistic implications of altered cellular glutathione and glutathione S-transferase

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 99-107

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9468

关键词

arsenic resistance; human; prostate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acquisition of stable arsenic tolerance in human cells following chronic arsenic exposure has not been previously reported. In the present work, we describe acquisition of stable arsenic tolerance in the human prostate epithelial cell line RWPE-1 following chronic arsenic exposure in vitro. RWPE-1 cells continuously exposed to 5 muM sodium arsenite for greater than or equal to18 weeks exhibited dramatic resistance to acute arsenite toxicity. The LC50 for acute arsenite exposure in these chronic arsenic-exposed prostate epithelial (CAsE-PE) cells was 43.8 muM versus 17.6 muM in control cells. Similar results were obtained using the antineoplastic agent arsenic trioxide. This tolerance was stable, as CAsE-PE cells grown in arsenic-free medium for 5 weeks retained their resistant phenotype. Compared to control cells, CAsE-PE cells showed a 90% reduction in arsenic accumulation over 24 h coupled with a 2.6-fold increase in the rate of arsenic efflux. CAsE-PE cells had increased basal GSH levels (4.9-fold) and increased GST activity (2.4-fold) and both GSH depletion and inhibition of GST activity abolished arsenic tolerance. Arsenic tolerance was also abolished by treatment with inhibitors of the Mdr1 and Mrp1 transporters, although no increases in mdr1 or mrp1 gene expression were observed. Our results indicate that this tolerance in human cells involves increases in GSH levels and GST activity that allow for more efficient arsenic efflux by MRP1 and MDR1. This study represents the first report of stable acquired arsenic tolerance in human cells, which could have important implications for both the toxicology and the pharmacology of arsenic. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据