4.6 Article

Electrochemistry and spectroelectrochemistry of ruthenium(II)-bipyridine building blocks. Different behaviour of the 2,3-and 2,5-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine bridging ligands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 532, 期 1-2, 页码 99-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)00905-1

关键词

cyclic voltammetry; electron transfer; spectroelectrochemistry; redox series; conformational analysis; molecular orbital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the results of an investigation, using electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical techniques, into redox properties of uncoordinated free bis-chelating 2,3- and 2,5-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine ligands (2,3- and 2,5-dpp) and of the complexes of the [Ru(2,3-dpp)(n)(bpy)(3-n)](2+) and [Ru(2,5-dpp)(n)(bpy)(3-n)](2+) families (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine), which are used as building blocks for obtaining polynuclear complexes. For comparison purposes, the electrochemical behaviour of the [Ru(2,3-dpp)(DCE-bpy)(2)](2+) complex, where DCE-bpy is 5.5'-dicarboxyethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, has also been investigated. Correlations of the E-1/2 values observed for the compounds examined (genetic diagrams) have allowed us to assign all the ligand-based reduction processes as well as to discuss electronic interactions. The localisation of the first three reduction processes for each complex has also been established on the basis of the spectroelectrochemical results. Theoretical calculations (AMI serniempirical and ab-initio level) carried out for the 2,5-dpp and 2,3-dpp ligands show that, in the uncoordinated state, the former ligand does not exhibit any substantial conformation arrangement, whereas the latter has a stable conformation for a large (56degrees) dihedral angle between the pyridyl and pyrazine rings. The changes in conformation upon mono- and bis-coordination of 2,3-dpp can account for its peculiar electrochemical behaviour consisting in a change of the number of redox processes with varying coordination state. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据