4.5 Article

Easily reversible desthiobiotin binding to streptavidin, avidin, and other biotin-binding proteins: uses for protein labeling, detection, and isolation

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 308, 期 2, 页码 343-357

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00201-4

关键词

desthiobiotin; amine-reactive; succinimidyl ester; bioconjugates; affinity chromatography; reversible binding; biotin; streptavidin; avidin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-affinity binding of biotin to avidin, streptavidin, and related proteins has been exploited for decades. However, a disadvantage of the biotin/biotin-binding protein interaction is that it is essentially irreversible under physiological conditions. Desthiobiotin is a biotin analogue that binds less tightly to biotin-binding proteins and is easily displaced by biotin. We synthesized an amine-reactive desthiobiotin derivative for labeling proteins and a desthiobiotin-agarose affinity matrix. Conjugates labeled with desthiobiotin are equivalent to their biotinylated counterparts in cell-staining and antigen-labeling applications. They also bind to streptavidin and other biotin-binding protein-based affinity columns and are recognized by anti-biotin antibodies. Fluorescent streptavidin conjugates saturated with desthiobiotin, but not biotin, bind to a cell-bound biotinylated target without further processing. Streptavidin-based ligands can be gently stripped from desthiobiotin-labeled targets with buffered biotin solutions. Thus, repeated probing with fluorescent streptavidin conjugates followed by enzyme-based detection is possible. In all applications, the desthiobiotin/biotin-binding protein complex is easily dissociated under physiological conditions by either biotin or desthiobiotin. Thus, our desthiobiotin-based reagents and techniques provide some distinct advantages over traditional 2-iminobiotin, monomeric avidin, or other affinity-based techniques. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据