4.6 Article

Regulation of immunoproteasome subunit expression in vivo following pathogenic fungal infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 169, 期 6, 页码 3046-3052

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3046

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI34361, AI42747] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proteasome catalytic beta subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-I and two proteasome activator proteins, PA28 alpha and beta are induced following exposure to IFN-gamma in vitro. Induction of these immunosubunits and the PA28 alpha/beta hetero-oligomer alters proteasome catalytic functions and specificity and enhances production of certain MHC class I epitopes. We sought to determine whether and to what extent proteasome subunit composition is regulated in vivo and to elucidate the mechanisms of such regulation. We analyzed basal expression levels of these inducible genes in normal, IFN-gamma-deficient, and Stat-1-deficient mice. Mice of all three genotypes display constitutive expression of the immunosubunits and PA28, demonstrating that basal expression in vivo is independent of endogenous IFN-gamma production. However, basal expression levels are reduced in Stat-1(-/-) mice, demonstrating a role for Stat-1 independent of IFN-gamma signaling. To demonstrate that IFN-gamma can induce these genes in vivo, mice were infected with Histoplasma capsulatum. Elevated expression of these genes followed the same time course as IFN-gamma expression in infected mice. IFN-gamma-deficient mice did not display elevated protein expression following infection, suggesting that other inflammatory cytokines produced in infected mice are unable to influence proteasome expression. Cytokines other than IFN-gamma also failed to influence proteasome gene expression in vitro in cell lines that had no basal expression of LMP2, LMP7, or MECL-1. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo data demonstrate that IFN-gamma is essential for up-regulation, but not constitutive expression, of immunoproteasome subunits in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据