4.7 Article

INFRARED SPECTRA AND SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR DUSTY STARBURSTS AND ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 730, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/19

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: starburst; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. NASA [1407, 1257184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present spectroscopic results for all galaxies observed with the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) that also have total infrared fluxes f(IR) measured with the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS), also using AKARI photometry when available. Infrared luminosities and spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from 8 mu m to 160 mu m are compared to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission from starburst galaxies or mid-infrared dust continuum from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at rest-frame wavelengths similar to 8 mu m. A total of 301 spectra are analyzed for which IRS and IRAS include the same unresolved source, as measured by the ratio f(v)(IRAS 25 mu m)/ f(v)(IRS 25 mu m). Sources have 0.004 < z < 0.34 and 42.5 < log L-IR < 46.8 (erg s(-1)) and cover the full range of starburst galaxy and AGN classifications. Individual spectra are provided electronically, but averages and dispersions are presented. We find that log [L-IR/vL(v)(7.7 mu m)] = 0.74 +/- 0.18 in starbursts, log [L-IR/vL(v) (7.7 mu m)] = 0.96 +/- 0.26 in composite sources (starburst plus AGN), log [L-IR/vL(v)(7.9 mu m)] = 0.80 +/- 0.25 in AGNs with silicate absorption, and that log [L-IR/vL(v)(7.9 mu m)] = 0.51 +/- 0.21 in AGNs with silicate emission. L-IR for the most luminous absorption and emission AGNs are similar and 2.5 times larger than for the most luminous starbursts. AGNs have systematically flatter SEDs than starbursts or composites, but their dispersion in SEDs overlaps starbursts. Sources with the strongest far-infrared luminosity from cool dust components are composite sources, indicating that these sources may contain the most obscured starbursts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据