4.5 Article

High-affinity urokinase-derived cyclic peptides inhibiting urokinase/urokinase receptor-interaction:: effects on tumor growth and spread

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 528, 期 1-3, 页码 212-216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03311-2

关键词

urokinase-type plasminogen activators; competitive uPA-derived peptide antagonists; cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) binds with high affinity to its specific cell surface receptor (uPAR) (CD87) via a well-defined sequence within the N-terminal region of uPA (uPA(19-31)). Since this uPA/uPAR-interaction plays a significant role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis, it has become an attractive therapeutic target. Two small peptidic cyclic competitive antagonists of uPA/uPAR-interaction have been developed, based on the uPAR binding site in uPA: WX-360 (CyClo(21.29) [D-Cys21]-uPA(21-30)[S21C;H29C]) and its norleucine (Nle) derivative WX-360-Nle (cyclo (21.29)[D-Cys21]uPA(21-30)[S21C;K23Nle;H29C]). These peptides display an only five to 10-fold lower affinity to uPAR as compared to the naturally occurring uPAR-ligand uPA. In this study, WX360 and WX-360-Nle were tested in nude mice for their potency to inhibit tumor growth and intraperitoneal spread of lacZ-tagged human ovarian cancer cells. Intraperitoneal administration of either cyclic peptide (20 mg peptide/kg; 1 X daily for 37 days) into the tumor-bearing nude mice resulted in a significant reduction of tumor weight and spread within the peritoneum as compared to the untreated control group. This is the first report demonstrating effective reduction of tumor growth and spread of human ovarian cancer cells in vivo by small synthetic uPA-derived cyclic peptides competitively interfering with uPA/uPAR-interaction. Thus, both WX-360 and WX-360-Nle are promising novel compounds to reduce dissemination of human ovarian carcinoma. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据