4.6 Article

Differential modulation of CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation by induction of nitric oxide synthesis in antigen presenting cells

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 836-845

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200209270-00018

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 16869] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. On antigenic stimulation, CD4 T cells generally proliferate more readily than CD8 T cells. The purpose of the present experiments was to determine whether nitric oxide (NO) might differentially modulate CD4 vs. CD8 T-cell proliferation. Methods. Various concentrations of C57BL/6 iNOS +/+ and -/- bone marrow (W-derived antigen presenting cells (APC) (obtained by culture in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF] and interleukin [IL]-4) were, cultured with purified BALB/c CD4 or CD8 T cells. Results. Proliferation of CD4 T cells was similar in the presence of both NO synthase (iNOS) +/+ and -/APC, whereas CD8 T cell proliferation was inhibited at the higher concentrations of iNOS +/+ dendritic cells (DC), coincident with increased levels of NO, in the culture supernatant. Analysis of cytokine levels revealed that more interferon (IFN)-gamma, a potent inducer of NO synthesis in many cell types, was present in CD8 T cell than in CD4 T-cell-APC cultures. Addition of IFN-gamma to CD4 T-cell-APC cultures resulted in induction of NO synthesis and inhibition of proliferation at higher levels of NO than that required to inhibit CD8T cell proliferation. However, CD4 T-cell proliferation was moderately inhibited in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated CD11c(+) DC, coincident with production of IFN-gamma and induction of NO synthesis. Conclusions. These findings indicate that CD8 T-cell proliferation can he inhibited by lesser amounts of APC-derived NO than is necessary to inhibit CD4 T cell proliferation. NO synthesis was not initiated in CD4 T cell-DC cultures unless costimulatory molecules were up-regulated. and IFN-gamma was produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据