4.5 Article

Distribution of calbindin D-28k in the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 451, 期 4, 页码 392-412

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.10370

关键词

calcium-binding protein; cynomolgus monkey; immunohistochemistry; medial temporal lobe

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH58847] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the distribution of calbindin D-28k-immunoreactive (CB-IR) neurons, fibers, and neuropil in the entorhinal (area 28), perirhinal (areas 35 and 36), and parahippocampal (areas TH and TF) cortices in the macaque monkey. Two main findings are reported. First, except for CB-IR neurogliaform cells that are only observed in the parahippocampal cortex, the morphology of CB-stained pyramidal and nonpyramidal cells were similar across the three cortical areas examined. Second, we find that the topography of CB staining differed between the three areas. The entorhinal cortex exhibits the most striking gradient of CB staining such that the most anterior and medial portions are most strongly labeled, whereas posterior and lateral areas exhibit only weak labeling. The labeling throughout the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices is more homogeneous. Area 35 contains only lightly stained neuropil and few CB-IR cells. Area 36 and areas TH and TF of the parahippocampal cortex contain a moderate to high density of CB-IR cells and fibers throughout their full rostrocaudal extents, although each area exhibits unique laminar patterns of staining. In all areas examined, the highest density of CB-positive cells and fibers is observed in superficial layers with lower densities of CB-positive cells and fibers present in deep layers. These findings, taken together with our current understanding of the connections of these areas may have implications for understanding the circuit properties of the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices areas in both normal and disease states. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据