4.7 Article

A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF HYDROGEN CHLORIDE IN THE GALAXY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 723, 期 1, 页码 218-228

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/218

关键词

ISM: abundances; ISM: molecules; submillimeter: ISM

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0540882]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [838261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report new observations of the fundamental J = 1-0 transition of HCl (at 625.918 GHz) toward a sample of 27 galactic star-forming regions, molecular clouds, and evolved stars, carried out using the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. Fourteen sources in the sample are also observed in the corresponding (HCl)-Cl-37 J = 1-0 transition (at 624.978 GHz). We have obtained clear detections in all but four of the targets, often in emission. Absorptions against bright background continuum sources are also seen in nine cases, usually involving a delicate balance between emission and absorption features. From RADEX modeling, we derive gas densities and HCl column densities for sources with HCl emission. HCl is found in a wide range of environments, with gas densities ranging from 105 to 107 cm(-3). The HCl abundance relative to H-2 is in the range of (3-30) x 10(-10). Comparing with the chlorine abundance in the solar neighborhood, this corresponds to a chlorine depletion factor of up to similar to 400, assuming that HCl accounts for one-third of the total chlorine in the gas phase. The [Cl-35]/[Cl-37] isotopic ratio is rather varied, from unity to similar to 5, mostly lower than the terrestrial value of 3.1. Such variation is highly localized, and could be generated by the nucleosynthesis in supernovae, which predicts a 37Cl deficiency in most models. The lower ratios seen in W3IRS4 and W3IRS5 likely confine the progenitors of the supernovae to stars with relatively large mass (greater than or similar to 25 M-circle dot) and high metallicity (Z similar to 0.02).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据