4.7 Article

DISKS IN THE ARCHES CLUSTER - SURVIVAL IN A STARBURST ENVIRONMENT

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 718, 期 2, 页码 810-831

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/810

关键词

circumstellar matter; Galaxy: center; open clusters and associations: individual (Arches); techniques: high angular resolution

资金

  1. W. M. Keck Foundation
  2. German Science Foundation [STO 496/3-1]
  3. NSF [AST 04-06816]
  4. University of California at Santa Cruz [AST 98-76783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep Keck/NIRC2 H K'L' observations of the Arches cluster near theGalactic center reveal a significant population of near-infrared excess sources. We combine the L'-band excess observations with K'-band proper motions, which allow us to confirm cluster membership of excess sources in a starburst cluster for the first time. The robust removal of field contamination provides a reliable disk fraction down to our completeness limit of H = 19 mag, or similar to 5 M-circle dot at the distance of the Arches. Of the 24 identified sources with K' - L' > 2.0 mag, 21 have reliable proper motion measurements, all of which are proper motion members of the Arches cluster. VLT/SINFONI K'-band spectroscopy of 3 excess sources reveals strong CO bandhead emission, which we interpret as the signature of dense circumstellar disks. The detection of strong disk emission from the Arches stars is surprising in view of the high mass of the B-type main sequence host stars of the disks and the intense starburst environment. We find a disk fraction of 6% +/- 2% among B-type stars in the Arches cluster. A radial increase in the disk fraction from 3% to 10% suggests rapid disk destruction in the immediate vicinity of numerous O-type stars in the cluster core. A comparison between the Arches and other high- and low-mass star-forming regions provides strong indication that disk depletion is significantly more rapid in compact starburst clusters than in moderate star-forming environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据