4.7 Article

STAR FORMATION HISTORIES IN A CLUSTER ENVIRONMENT AT z ∼ 0.84

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 725, 期 1, 页码 1252-1276

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/1252

关键词

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: individual (RX J0152.7-1357); galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

资金

  1. ESO in Garching
  2. BASAL Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies
  3. FONDECYT [1100540]
  4. Oskar Klein Center at the University of Stockholm
  5. NASA [NAS5-32865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a spectrophotometric analysis of galaxies belonging to the dynamically young, massive cluster RX J0152.7-1357 at z similar to 0.84, aimed at understanding the effects of the cluster environment on the star formation history (SFH) of cluster galaxies and the assembly of the red sequence (RS). We use VLT/FORS spectroscopy, ACS/WFC optical, and NTT/SofI near-IR data to characterize SFHs as a function of color, luminosity, morphology, stellar mass, and local environment from a sample of 134 spectroscopic members. In order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, individual galaxy spectra are stacked according to these properties. Moreover, the D4000, Balmer, CN3883, Fe4383, and C4668 indices are also quantified. The SFH analysis shows that galaxies in the blue faint-end of the RS have on average younger stars (Delta t similar to 2 Gyr) than those in the red bright-end. We also found, for a given luminosity range, differences in age (Delta t similar to 0.5-1.3 Gyr) as a function of color, indicating that the intrinsic scatter of the RS may be due to age variations. Passive galaxies in the blue faint-end of the RS are preferentially located in the low density areas of the cluster, likely being objects entering the RS from the blue cloud. It is likely that the quenching of the star formation of these RS galaxies is due to interaction with the intracluster medium. Furthermore, the SFH of galaxies in the RS as a function of stellar mass reveals signatures of downsizing in the overall cluster.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据