4.3 Article

Interaction of lipoteichoic acid and CpG-DNA during activation of innate immune cells

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 206, 期 4, 页码 392-407

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1078/0171-2985-00189

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The innate immune system recognizes pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) to cope with evolving infections. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a pivotal role in recognition of PAMPs. In the course of infection not a single but rather a full panel of different microbial components interacts with distinct TLRs simultaneously. Only limited information is available on effects of combinations of TLR agonists. Here, we have analyzed the effects of lipoteichoic acid (LTA), CpG-DNA and combinations thereof on innate immune cells in vitro. Although proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-alpha were induced by these agonists in quite similar amounts, CpG DNA was superior in its potency to induce IL-12p40 reflecting important differences in the biological valence of LTA and CpG-DNA. When given in combination, LTA and CpG-DNA were additive in induction of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and nitric oxide in RAW 264 macrophages, peritoneal macrophages and dendritic cells. Additive effects were also observed in regard to TNF-alpha mRNA. In contrast, LTA suppressed IL12p40 secretion induced by CpG-DNA in RAW cells and peritoneal macrophages but not in dendritic cells. Intracellular signal cascades (NFkappaB and p38 MAP kinase) showed additive effects after simultaneous triggering. mRNA expression of TLRs showed only minor regulation after CpG or LTA application and thus does not account for the additive/suppressive effects observed. These results indicate that the consequences of interaction of innate immune cells with microbial pattern depend on the responding cell type and might be differential for certain effector mechanisms. Thus, the pathogen-characteristic panel of TLR ligands will induce pathogen-specific innate responses decisive for the inflammatory reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据