4.6 Article

Regulation of carbon metabolic fluxes in response to CO2 supplementation in phototrophic Chlorella vulgaris: a cytomic and biochemical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 737-745

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-015-0542-4

关键词

Chlorella vulgaris; CO2; Carbohydrate; Lipid; Fatty acid

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Project) [2011CB200904, 2011CB200901]
  2. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program (863 Project) [2013AA065802]
  3. National Sciences Foundation of China [31370383, 31270085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As one of the promising species of microalgae for biofuel production, Chlorella vulgaris CS-42 was cultivated phototrophically in two cylindrical photobioreactors with aeration of 5 % (v/v) CO2 or air for 13 days to evaluate the effects of CO2 supplementation on biomass, CO2 fixation performance, and biochemical content. Significant increases of specific growth rate and total carbon content in biomass resulting in a higher CO2 fixation rate were found with 5 % CO2. The maximum biomass concentration, carbohydrate and fatty acid contents with 5 % CO2 were significantly higher than those with air, while carbohydrate biosynthesis was most affected as compared to other biochemical components. Cytomic analysis revealed a rapid accumulation of neutral lipid in the late growth phase with more lipid bodies visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), when nitrate consumption was accelerated with CO2 supplementation. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis indicated that 5 % CO2 favored the formation of C18:2, which led to a decrease in the degree of lipid unsaturation (DLU). These results proved that CO2 supplementation was one of the most efficient methods to significantly prompt the growth of microalgae and increase the C/N ratio in the medium, which in turn regulated the carbon metabolic flux to enhance neutral lipid and fatty acid production in C. vulgaris.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据