4.5 Review

Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats - Sex differences

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 663-671

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(02)00853-5

关键词

alternative reinforcer; cocaine; exercise; intravenous; rat; self-administration; sex; substitution; wheel-running

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [F31 AA005575] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R37 DA03240] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experiment examines the effect of access to a running-wheel on intravenous cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Rats maintained at 85% of their free-feeding body weight were first exposed to the running-wheel alone during the 6-h sessions until behavior stabilized for 14 days. Intravenous cannulae were then implanted, and the rats were trained to self-administer a low dose of cocaine (0.2 mg/kg) under a fixed-ratio (FR 1) schedule during the 6-h sessions, while the wheel remained inactive and cocaine self-administration stabilized (cocaine-only condition). Next, the wheel access and cocaine self-administration were concurrently available followed by a period of cocaine-only. Behavior was allowed to stabilize for 10 days at each phase. During wheel access, cocaine infusions decreased by 21.9% in males and 70.6% in females compared to the cocaine-only condition; the effect was statistically significant in females. Infusions increased to baseline levels when wheel access was terminated. When cocaine infusions were concurrently available, wheel revolutions were reduced by 63.7% and 61.5% in males and females, respectively, compared to the wheel-only condition. This result did not differ due to sex, but it was statistically significant when data from males and females were combined. These results indicate that wheel-running activity had a greater suppressant effect on cocaine self-administration in females than in males, and in females, wheel-running and cocaine self-administration are substitutable as reinforcers. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据