4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Commercial cultivation and bioremediation potential of sugar kelp, Saccharina latissima, in Danish waters

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1963-1973

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-014-0519-8

关键词

Biofilter; Nitrogen removal; Phosphorous removal; Epiphytes; Year-round variation; N quota; IMTA

资金

  1. Danish AgriFish Agency (GUDP) [3405-11-0375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several seaweed species have been successfully tested for their biofilter potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA). In this study, Saccharina latissima bioremediation potential was assessed over 12 months with respect to the yield, phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N) content and removal. The experiment took place at two commercial cultivation areas: in close proximity to a blue mussel and fish farm (IMTA) and at a reference site, both situated outside Horsens Fjord in Denmark. The maximum biomass yield over the first growing season was achieved in August (1.08 +/- 0.09 and 1.51 +/- 0.13 kg fresh weight (FW) m(-1)) and September (0.92 +/- 0.18 and 1.49 +/- 0.16 kg FW m(-1)). Yield was significantly higher at the IMTA compared to the reference site in August (P < 0.05). A second growing season did not improve biofiltration efficiency. The highest N and P removal was achieved in August and September. Again, the IMTA location showed better N and P removal compared with the reference site in August: 5.02-7.02 g N and 0.86-1.23 g P m(-1) of cultivation line (P < 0.05). S. latissima shows potential for assimilation and removal of nutrients, particularly nitrogen. Seasonal variations of seaweed biofilter efficiency, condition, and potential applications should be taken into account when evaluating the best suited harvest time. For Horsens Fjord, our results showed that the harvest time should take place in August-September in order to achieve maximum biofiltration efficiency (including N and P in epiphytes). However, for human consumption, it is better to harvest in May when the seaweed is free of epiphytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据