4.4 Article

Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 24, 期 15, 页码 774-785

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638280210125814

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Many stroke survivors have to cope with impairments and disabilities that may result in the occurrence of handicap situations. The purpose of the study was to explore bio-psycho-social predictors of handicap situations six months after discharge from an intensive rehabilitation programme. Methods: At discharge from a rehabilitation programme, participants were evaluated with instruments measuring motor, sensory, cognitive, perceptual, affective and psychosocial impairments and disabilities that may play a role in the development of handicap. Some other demographic and clinical variables, and those related to rehabilitation, were also collected. Six months later, they were re-assessed in their own environment in order to document their handicap level with the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H). Results: One hundred and thirty-two stroke patients participated in the discharge evaluation and 102 of them also participated in the handicap measurement. Relationships between handicap level and impairments and disabilities were all statistically significant. Multiple regression analyses indicated that affect, lower extremity co-ordination, length of stay in rehabilitation, balance, age and comorbidity at the end of an intensive rehabilitation programme are the best predictors of handicap situations six months later (adjusted R-2 : 68.1%). Conclusions: In spite of its exploratory nature, this study revealed that, among a substantial number of personal characteristics, some were more related to a handicap measure and have greater predictive value. Other studies should be carried out to validate these findings and to consider more environmental factors in order to better understand factors related to the development of handicap situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据