4.4 Article

The human complement regulator factor H binds pneumococcal surface protein PspC via short consensus repeats 13 to 15

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 70, 期 10, 页码 5604-5611

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5604-5611.2002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The innate ability of Streptococcus pneumoniae to resist complement activation and complement-mediated phagocytosis may be a direct consequence of the ability of the bacteria to bind components of the complement regulatory system. One such component, factor H (fH), is a crucial fluid-phase negative regulator of the alternative pathway of complement and is utilized by a number of pathogenic organisms to resist complement attack. The pneumococcal surface protein C (PspC [also known as CbpA] and SpsA) has been shown to bind fH, although the exact binding site within one or more of the 20 short consensus repeats (SCRs) of the molecule is not known. The purpose of the current study was to map specific SCRs on III responsible for this binding. Initial experiments utilizing type 2 pneumococcal strain D39 and its isogenic PspC-negative derivative (D39/pspC mutant) showed that III binding was PspC dependent. A purified recombinant protein derivative of PspC that lacked the proline-rich region (PspCDeltaPro) had a reduced binding efficiency for fH, thereby directly showing the importance of this region for the III interaction. We have specifically shown by inhibition experiments that SCRs responsible for heparin and Cab binding of fH are not involved in binding PspC and the interaction between fH and PspC is largely hydrophobic, since no inhibition was observed in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl. Construction of SCR proteins encompassing the whole III molecule showed that SCRs 8 to 15 (SCR 8-15) mediated binding to PspC. Further localization experiments revealed that SCR 13 and SCR 15 were required for full binding, although partial binding was retained when either SCR was removed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据