4.7 Article

Higher weight at birth is related to decreased maternal amino acid oxidation during pregnancy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 852-857

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL NUTRITION
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.852

关键词

nutrition; pregnancy; amino acid oxidation; urea production; birth weight; fetal origins; white women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Small size at birth is associated with cardiovascular disease in adult life. Decreased fetal growth may result from a limitation in the nutrient supply to the fetus. Net tissue deposition in the mother and fetus increases the demand for nitrogen, but because maternal consumption of protein does not increase, there must be a change in the partitioning of amino acids, away from oxidation and toward deposition. Objective: Our objective was to characterize amino acid oxidation in pregnancy and to investigate whether the relative partitioning of amino acids was related to fetal growth. Design: We determined amino acid oxidation as urea production in 25 women during mid (17-19 wk) and late (26-29 wk) gestation. Urea production was measured from urinary [N-15-N-15]urea excretion over 48 h after a single oral dose of [N-15-N-15]urea. We measured the infant's size at birth. Results: For the group as a whole, urea excretion decreased and amino acid oxidation remained similar between mid and late pregnancy, but there was wide variation between the women. Heavier infants were born to the mothers in whom amino acid oxidation decreased the most during pregnancy (slope of regression line: -80 g.g N-1.d(-1); 95% CI: -129, -31; P = 0.003). After adjustment for length of gestation and the infant's sex, the change in maternal amino acid oxidation explained 34% of the variation in birth weight. Conclusions: Amino acid oxidation varied widely between the women during pregnancy. Understanding the ability of a pregnant,woman to adapt metabolically may have implications for establishing dietary recommendations in pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据