4.5 Article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) signaling in the gene regulatory control of energy metabolism in the normal and diseased heart

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 1249-1257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2002.2061

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL 13851, P01 HL 57278-05, R01 HL 58454, F32 HL 67575] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK 56341, R01 DK 45416, P30 DK 52574] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tremendous energy demands of the post-natal mammalian heart are fulfilled via dynamic flux through mitochondrial oxidative pathways. The capacity for energy production via fatty acid (FA) beta-oxidation pathway is determined, in part, by the regulated expression of genes encoding FA utilization enzymes and varies in accordance with diverse dietary and physiologic conditions. For example, fasting and diabetes activate the expression of cardiac FA oxidation (FAO). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that is known to control the expression of many genes involved in cellular FA import and oxidation. Cardiac FA utilization rates are reduced in PPARalpha null mice due to diminished expression of genes encoding FAO enzymes. Recent work has shown that the PPARalpha regulatory pathway is deactivated in pathologic cardiac hypertrophy and hypoxia, two circumstances characterized by reduced FAO and increased dependence on glucose as a fuel source. Conversely, the activity of the PPARalpha gene regulatory pathway is increased in the diabetic heart, which relies primarily on FAO for energy production. In fact, evidence is emerging that excessive FA import and oxidation may be a cause of pathologic cardiac remodeling in the diabetic heart. This review summarizes the regulation of cardiac substrate utilization pathways via the PPARalpha complex in the normal and diseased heart. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据