4.7 Article

The peripheral antinociceptive with activation of effect of resveratrol is associated potassium channels

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 917-923

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00130-2

关键词

K+ channel; resveratrol; apamin; charybdotoxin; glibenclamide; 4-aminopyridine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The possible participation of K+ channels in the antinociceptive action induced by resveratrol was assessed in the 1% formalin test. Local administration of resveratrol produced a dose-dependent antinociception in the second phase of the test. The antinociception produced by resveratrol was due to a local action as its administration in the contralateral paw was not active. Local pretreatment of the injured paw with glibenclamide, tolbutamide or glipizide (ATP-sensitive K+ channel inhibitors) did not modify resveratrol-induced antinociception. In contrast, charybdotoxin and apamin (large and small conductance Ca2+ activated-K+ channel blockers, respectively), 4-aminopyridine or tetraethylammonium (voltage-dependent K+ channel inhibitors) dose-dependently prevented resveratrol-induced antinociception. Local peripheral administration of glibenclamide, but not charybdotoxin or apamin, significantly reduced the antinociceptive effect produced by peripheral morphine (positive control). At the highest effective doses, none of the drugs used induced behavioral side effects as revealed by the evaluation of stepping, righting, corneal and pinna reflexes. In addition, when given alone, none of the inhibitors modified the nociceptive behavior induced by 1% formalin. The results suggest that resveratrol opens large and small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels, but not ATP-sensitive K+ channels, in order to produce its peripheral antinociceptive effect in the formalin test. The participation of voltage-dependent K+ channels was also suggested, but since non-selective inhibitors were used the data awaits further confirmation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据