4.7 Article

THE EFFECT OF H2O ON ICE PHOTOCHEMISTRY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 718, 期 2, 页码 832-840

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/832

关键词

astrochemistry; circumstellar matter; ISM: molecules; methods: laboratory; molecular data molecular processes

资金

  1. NASA
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. NOVA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UV irradiation of simple ices is proposed to efficiently produce complex organic species during star formation and planet formation. Through a series of laboratory experiments, we investigate the effects of the H2O concentration, the dominant ice constituent in space, on the photochemistry of more volatile species, especially CH4, in ice mixtures. In the experiments, thin (similar to 40 ML) ice mixtures, kept at 20-60 K, are irradiated under ultrahigh vacuum conditions with a broadband UV hydrogen discharge lamp. Photodestruction cross sections of volatile species (CH4 and NH3) and production efficiencies of new species (C2H6, C2H4, CO, H2CO, CH3OH, CH3CHO, and CH3CH2OH) in water-containing ice mixtures are determined using reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy during irradiation and during a subsequent slow warm-up. The four major effects of increasing the H2O concentration are: (1) an increase of the destruction efficiency of the volatile mixture constituent by up to an order of magnitude due to a reduction of back reactions following photodissociation, (2) a shift to products rich in oxygen, e.g., CH3OH and H2CO, (3) trapping of up to a factor of 5 more of the formed radicals in the ice, and (4) a disproportional increase in the diffusion barrier for the OH radical compared with the CH3 and HCO radicals. The radical diffusion temperature dependencies are consistent with calculated H2O-radical bond strengths. All the listed effects are potentially important for the production of complex organics in H2O-rich icy grain mantles around protostars and should thus be taken into account when modeling ice chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据