4.5 Article

Pretreatment of rats with the inducing agents phenobarbitone and 3-methylcholanthrene ameliorates the toxicity of chromium (VI) in hepatocytes

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 509-516

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00040-1

关键词

chromium (VI) toxicity; inducing agents; hepatocytes; phenobarbitone; 3-methylcholanthrene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To exert cytotoxicity chromium VI (Cr(VI)) has to be reduced inside cells. This is achieved through both enzymatic and nonenzymatic mechanisms. Enzymatic mechanisms include DT-diaphorase, cytochrome P450, and NADPH cytochrome c reductase, and non-enzymatic mechanisms involve reduced glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid. The extent of cytotoxicity of Cr(VI) may thus be influenced by the availability of non-enzymatic reductants, and by the activities of the reductase enzymes. In the present paper we have investigated the effect of pretreatment with the inducing agents, phenobarbitone (PB) and 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC), on the response of rat hepatocytes to Cr(VI). Pretreatment with PB increased the activity of NADPH cytochrome c reductase, and 3-MC increased DT-diaphorase activity in hepatocytes. Both inducers increased cytochrome P450 content, while neither influenced intracellular GSH content or the activity of glutathione reductase. Pretreatment with either PB or 3-MC resulted in amelioration of Cr(VI) toxicity both in terms of hepatocyte viability, and to a greater extent, in terms of Cr(VI) induced GSH loss. We propose that the inducing agents increase the amount of enzymatic reduction of Cr(VI) relative to non-enzymatic reduction. Thus, less GSH is used in the reduction of Cr(VI), and intracellular GSH does not fall as rapidly as in cells from control animals therefore cell integrity is better maintained. Exposure to environmental inducing agents in vivo may also alter the response of human tissues to Cr(VI). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据