4.7 Article

A GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT DETERMINATION OF THE MEAN MASS OF WHITE DWARFS. DA STARS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 712, 期 1, 页码 585-595

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/585

关键词

stars: kinematics and dynamics; techniques: radial velocities; techniques: spectroscopic; white dwarfs

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-0909107]
  2. Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program [003658-02552007]
  3. The University of Texas System
  4. Sandia National Laboratories
  5. Delaware Asteroseismic Center
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0909107] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measure apparent velocities (v(app)) of the H alpha and H beta Balmer line cores for 449 non-binary thin disk normal DA white dwarfs (WDs) using optical spectra taken for the European Southern Observatory SN Ia progenitor survey (SPY). Assuming these WDs are nearby and comoving, we correct our velocities to the local standard of rest so that the remaining stellar motions are random. By averaging over the sample, we are left with the mean gravitational redshift, < v(g)>: we find < v(g)> = < v(app)> = 32.57 +/- 1.17 km s(-1). Using the mass-radius relation from evolutionary models, this translates to a mean mass of 0.647(-0.014)(+0.013)M(circle dot). We interpret this as the mean mass for all DAs. Our results are in agreement with previous gravitational redshift studies but are significantly higher than all previous spectroscopic determinations except the recent findings of Tremblay & Bergeron. Since the gravitational redshift method is independent of surface gravity from atmosphere models, we investigate the mean mass of DAs with spectroscopic T(eff) both above and below 12,000 K; fits to line profiles give a rapid increase in the mean mass with decreasing T(eff). Our results are consistent with no significant change in mean mass: < M >(hot) = 0.640 +/- 0.014 M(circle dot) and < M >(cool) = 0.686(-0.039)(+0.035)M(circle dot).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据