4.6 Article

Influence of silicate on enrichment of highly productive microalgae from a mixed culture

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 1453-1457

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-015-0678-2

关键词

Mixed cultures; Selective environment; Green algae; Diatoms; Storage compounds

资金

  1. Dutch Foundation for Technical Sciences (STW) [11610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae have the potential to supply a biobased society with essential feedstocks like sugar and lipids. Besides being productive, strains used for this purpose should grow fast, be resistant to predators, and have good harvestability properties. Diatoms, a class of siliceous algae, have these and other preferred characteristics. In this paper, we describe the enrichment of microalgae in sequencing batch reactors with and without supply of silicate. Both reactors were operated with a light-dark cycle. To maximize storage compound production, carbon fixation and nitrogen uptake were uncoupled by limiting the availability of nitrate to the dark phase. After ten cycles, a stable culture was established in both reactors. The diatom Nitzschia sp. dominated the silicate-rich reactor, and the green algae Chlamydomonas sp. dominated the silicate-depleted reactor. Over the remaining 27 cycles of the experiment, the microalgal community structure did not change, indicating a highly stable system. Although the dominant microalga was highly dependent on the presence of silicate, the performance of both microalgal enrichments was similar. Polymers of glucose were stored during the nitrogen-limited light period. On organic matter dry weight basis, the sugar content of the biomass increased during the light period from 17 +/- 4 to 53 +/- 4 % for the silicate-limited culture, and from 14 +/- 4 to 43 +/- 4 % (w w (-1)) for the silicate excess culture. These results show that storage compound production can be achieved under various conditions, as long as a selective environment is maintained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据