4.7 Article

ULTRA-COMPACT DWARFS IN THE CORE OF THE COMA CLUSTER

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 722, 期 2, 页码 1707-1715

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1707

关键词

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: star clusters: general; galaxies: structure; globular clusters: general

资金

  1. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001149/1, ST/H002391/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [PP/E001149/1, ST/H002391/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have discovered both a red and a blue subpopulation of ultra-compact dwarf (UCD) galaxy candidates in the Coma galaxy cluster. We analyzed deep F475W (Sloan g) and F814W (I) Hubble Space Telescope images obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys Wide Field Channel as part of the Coma Cluster Treasury Survey and have fitted the light profiles of similar to 5000 point-like sources in the vicinity of NGC 4874, one of the two central dominant galaxies of the Coma Cluster. Although almost all of these sources are globular clusters that remain unresolved, we found that 52 objects have effective radii between similar to 10 and 66 pc, in the range spanned by dwarf globular transition objects (DGTOs) and UCDs. Of these 52 compact objects, 25 are brighter than M(V) similar to -11 mag, a magnitude conventionally thought to separate UCDs and globular clusters. The UCD/DGTO candidates have the same color and luminosity distribution as the most luminous globular clusters within the red and blue subpopulations of the immensely rich NGC 4874 globular cluster system. Unlike standard globular clusters, blue and red UCD/DGTO subpopulations have the same median effective radius. The spatial distribution of UCD/DGTO candidates reveals that they congregate toward NGC 4874 and are not uniformly distributed. We find a relative deficit of UCD/DGTOs compared with globular clusters in the inner 15 kpc around NGC 4874; however, at larger radii UCD/DGTO and globular clusters follow the same spatial distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据