4.7 Article

THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. THE ANGULAR-DIAMETER DISTANCE TO UGC 3789

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 718, 期 2, 页码 657-665

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/657

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; cosmology: observations; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: individual (UGC 3789); galaxies: nuclei; masers

资金

  1. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Megamaser Cosmology Project (MCP) aims to determine H(0) by measuring angular-diameter distances to galaxies in the Hubble flow using observations of water vapor megamasers in the circumnuclear accretion disks of active galaxies. The technique is based only on geometry and determines H(0) in one step, independent of standard candles and the extragalactic distance ladder. In Paper I, we presented a very long baseline interferometry map of the maser emission from the Seyfert 2 galaxy UGC 3789. The map reveals an edge-on, sub-parsec disk in Keplerian rotation, analogous to the megamaser disk in NGC 4258. Here, we present 3.2 years of monthly Green Bank Telescope observations of the megamaser disk in UGC 3789. We use these observations to measure the centripetal accelerations of both the systemic and high-velocity maser components. The measured accelerations suggest that maser emission lines near the systemic velocity originate on the front side of the accretion disk, primarily from segments of two narrow rings. Adopting a two-ring model for the systemic features, we determine the angular-diameter distance to UGC 3789 to be 49.9 +/- 7.0 Mpc. This is the most accurate geometric distance to a galaxy in the Hubble flow yet obtained. Based on this distance, we determine H(0) = 69 +/- 11 km s(-1) Mpc(-1). We also measure the mass of the central black hole to be 1.09 x 10(7) M(circle dot) +/- 14%. With additional observations, the uncertainty in the distance to this galaxy can be reduced to under 10%. Observations of megamaser disks in other galaxies will further reduce the uncertainty in H(0) as measured by the MCP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据