4.2 Article

Increased concentrations of radioisotopically-labeled complementary ribonucleic acid probe, dextran sulfate, and dithiothreitol in the hybridization buffer can improve results of in situ hybridization histochemistry

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1389-1400

出版社

HISTOCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1177/002215540205001012

关键词

autoradiography; background; brain; complementary ribonucleic acid probes; dextran sulfate; dithiothreitol; image analysis; in situ hybridization; quantitation; radioisotope

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD27305] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of the present studies was to optimize mRNA detection with radioisotopic in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH). Test experiments performed on sections of rat brain tissue used computer-assisted image analysis to compare autoradiographic signals resulting when varying concentrations of S-35-labeled cRNA probes, dextran sulfate (DS), and dithiothreitol (DTT) were used for ISHH. We found that greatly enhanced corrected signal density (total density of signal area minus background density) was obtained using concentrations of probe and/or DS that were several-fold higher than those widely recommended in published ISHH procedures (probe concentration >4 x 10(4) cpm/mul; DS concentration >10%). Extended hybridization reaction (>16 hr) also significantly augmented the corrected signal density. Finally, nonspecific probe binding was greatly reduced and corrected signal density enhanced by including 750-1000 mM, rather than the widely used 10-200 mM DTT, in the hybridization buffer. These observations indicate that the low efficiency of hybridization and the formation of high background may largely compromise the sensitivity of routine ISHH procedures. We suggest that the new method using increased concentrations of S-35-labeled cRNA probe, DS, and DTT will be especially important for the cellular localization of rare mRNA species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据