4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Spinal interneurones; how can studies in animals contribute to the understanding of spinal interneuronal systems in man?

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 40, 期 1-3, 页码 19-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0173(02)00185-6

关键词

spinal interneuronal systems; modulatory actions of monoamines; exaggerated stretch reflexes; spasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first part of this review deals with arguments that the essential properties and organization of spinal interneuronal systems in the cat and in man are similar. The second part is concerned with the possibility that some interneuronal systems may be responsible for motor disturbances caused by spina: cord injuries and that these interneurones may be defined. This possibility is discussed with respect to the hyperexcitability of alpha-motorneurones and the exaggeration of stretch reflexes in spastic patients. To this end, what is known about cat spinal interneurones and about the neuronal basis and pharmacological treatment of spasticity, is put together. Interneurones in di- and trisynaptic reflex pathways from group II muscle afferents are singled out, since they are depressed by the a, noradrenaline receptor agonists clonidine and tizanidine, which is a critical feature of interneurones expected to contribute to exaggerated stretch reflexes which are reduced by a, noradrenaline receptor agonists. Recent observations that reflex excitation of extensor motoneurones from group II afferents is enhanced in spastic patients and that the pathologically strong reflex actions of group II afferents are reduced by clonidine and tizanidine support this proposal. On the other hand, a lack of effect of clonidine and tizanidine upon other types of excitatory or inhibitory interneurones argues against any major contribution of such interneurones to the abnormally strong responses of alpha-motoneurones to muscle stretch. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据