4.7 Article

FOREGROUND CONTAMINATION IN INTERFEROMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE REDSHIFTED 21 cm POWER SPECTRUM

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 695, 期 1, 页码 183-199

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/183

关键词

early universe; intergalactic medium; methods: data analysis; radio lines: general; techniques: interferometric

资金

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  2. School of Science
  3. NSF [AST-0457585]
  4. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  5. Hubble Fellowship [HF-01205.01-A]
  6. Space Telescope Science Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subtraction of astrophysical foreground contamination from dirty skymaps produced by simulated measurements of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) has been performed by fitting a third-order polynomial along the spectral dimension of each pixel in the data cubes. The simulations are the first to include the unavoidable instrumental effects of the frequency-dependent primary antenna beams and synthesized array beams. They recover the one-dimensional spherically binned input redshifted 21 cm power spectrum within similar to 1% over the scales probed most sensitively by the MWA (0.01 less than or similar to k less than or similar to 1 Mpc(-1)) and demonstrate that realistic instrumental effects will not mask the epoch of reionization signal. We find that the weighting function used to produce the dirty sky maps from the gridded visibility measurements is important to the success of the technique. Uniform weighting of the visibility measurements produces the best results, whereas natural weighting significantly worsens the foreground subtraction by coupling structure in the density of the visibility measurements to spectral structure in the dirty sky map data cube. The extremely dense uv-coverage of the MWA was found to be advantageous for this technique and produced very good results on scales corresponding to |u| less than or similar to 500 lambda in the uv-plane without any selective editing of the uv-coverage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据