4.7 Article

SPITZER INFRARED SPECTROGRAPH OBSERVATIONS OF CLASS I/II OBJECTS IN TAURUS: COMPOSITION AND THERMAL HISTORY OF THE CIRCUMSTELLAR ICES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 694, 期 1, 页码 459-478

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/459

关键词

astrochemistry; infrared: ISM; ISM: abundances; ISM: molecules; stars: pre-main sequence

资金

  1. NASA [1257184]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F003196/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/F003196/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present observations of Taurus-Auriga Class I/II protostars obtained with the Spitzer InfraRed Spectrograph. Detailed spectral fits to the 6 and 15.2 micron ice features are made, using publicly available laboratory data, to constrain the molecular composition, abundances, and levels of thermal processing along the lines of sight. We provide an inventory of the molecular environments observed, which have an average composition dominated by water-ice with similar to 12% CO2 ( abundance relative to H2O), greater than or similar to 2%-9% CH3OH, similar to 14% NH3, similar to 3% CH4, similar to 2% H2CO, similar to 0.6% HCOOH, and similar to 0.5% SO2. We find CO2/H2O ratios nearly equivalent to those observed in cold clouds and lines of sight toward the galactic center. The unidentified 6.8 micron profiles vary from source to source, and it is shown to be likely that even combinations of the most common candidates ( NH4+ and CH3OH) are inadequate to explain the feature fully. We discuss correlations among SED spectral indices, abundance ratios, and thermally processed ice fractions and their implications for CO2 formation and evolution. Comparison of our spectral fits with cold molecular cloud sight lines indicates abundant prestellar ice environments made even richer by the radiative effects of protostars. Our results add additional constraints and a finer level of detail to current full-scale models of protostellar and protoplanetary systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据