4.7 Article

χ2 AND POISSONIAN DATA: BIASES EVEN IN THE HIGH-COUNT REGIME AND HOW TO AVOID THEM

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 693, 期 1, 页码 822-829

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/822

关键词

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; X-rays: galaxies: clusters; X-rays: general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that two approximations to the chi(2) statistic as popularly employed by observational astronomers for fitting Poisson-distributed data can give rise to intrinsically biased model parameter estimates, even in the high-count regime, unless care is taken over the parameterization of the problem. For a small number of problems, previous studies have shown that the fractional bias introduced by these approximations is often small when the counts are high. However, we show that for a broad class of problem, unless the number of data bins is far smaller than root N-c, where N-c is the total number of counts in the data set, the bias will still likely be comparable to, or even exceed, the statistical error. Conversely, we find that fits using Cash's C-statistic give comparatively unbiased parameter estimates when the counts are high. Taking into account their well-known problems in the low-count regime, we conclude that these approximate chi(2) methods should not routinely be used for fitting an arbitrary, parameterized model to Poisson-distributed data, irrespective of the number of counts per bin, and instead the C-statistic should be adopted. We discuss several practical aspects of using the C-statistic in modeling real data. We illustrate the bias for two specific problems-measuring the count rate from a light curve and obtaining the temperature of a thermal plasma from its X-ray spectrum measured with the Chandra X-ray observatory. In the context of X-ray astronomy, we argue the bias could give rise to systematically miscalibrated satellites and a similar to 5-10% shift in galaxy cluster scaling relations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据