4.6 Article

The effects of cultivation depth, areal density, and nutrient level on lipid accumulation of Scenedesmus acutus in outdoor raceway ponds

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 1459-1469

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-015-0709-z

关键词

Raceways; Microalgae; Scenedesmus; Lipid accumulation; Areal productivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid accumulation is critical in the production of biodiesel from microalgae. However, little work has been done on the assessment of lipid accumulation during nitrogen stress in large research-scale outdoor raceways during different seasons; most values for lipid accumulation are assumptions based on work completed in laboratory settings or outdoor photobioreactors. This study focused on the use of raceway ponds operated in batch cultivation mode with an area of 30.37 m(2) to determine the impacts of nitrate-nitrogen concentration and cultivation depth on the ability of Scenedesmus acutus strain LB 0414 to accumulate lipids. A concentration of less than 60 mg N-NO3-L-1 was required for removal of nitrogen in the cultivation medium within 8 days to stimulate lipid accumulation and increase lipid productivity. When nitrate concentrations were increased to prevent nitrogen depletion, lipid productivity decreased, which demonstrates that stressing is needed to induce lipid accumulation for increased lipid productivity. Additionally, decreasing cultivation depth below 9 cm, compared to raceways operated at a depth of 20-24 cm, increased lipid productivity by 62 % in December 2014 and 38 % in February 2015. More desirable environmental conditions, mainly increased sunlight and temperature, in February, increased biodiesel productivity for all raceways and account for the decrease in productivity differences. This research highlights increased lipid productivity found by reducing cultivation depth and nitrogen concentrations in outdoor raceways and provides insight into the optimal conditions for large-scale biodiesel production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据