4.7 Article

STAR FORMATION AND DUST OBSCURATION AT z ≈ 2: GALAXIES AT THE DAWN OF DOWNSIZING

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 698, 期 2, 页码 L116-L120

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/L116

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; galaxies: statistics; surveys

资金

  1. ASI
  2. NASA [G07-8136A, HST-GO-09822]
  3. [ANR-07-BLAN-0228-03]
  4. [ANR-08-JCJC-0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present first results of a study aimed to constrain the star formation rate (SFR) and dust content of galaxies at z approximate to 2. We use a sample of BzK-selected star-forming galaxies, drawn from the Cosmic Evolution Survey, to perform a stacking analysis of their 1.4 GHz radio continuum as a function of different stellar population properties, after cleaning the sample from contamination by active galactic nuclei. Dust unbiased SFRs are derived from radio fluxes assuming the local radio-IR correlation. The main results of this work are: (1) specific star formation rate (SSFR) s are constant over about 1 dex in stellar mass and up to the highest stellar mass probed, (2) the dust attenuation is a strong function of galaxy stellar mass with more massive galaxies being more obscured than lower mass objects, (3) a single value of the UV extinction applied to all galaxies would lead to a gross underestimate of the SFR in massive galaxies, (4) correcting the observed UV luminosities for dust attenuation based on the Calzetti recipe provides results in very good agreement with the radio derived ones, (5) the mean SSFR of our sample steadily decreases by a factor of similar to 4 with decreasing redshift from z = 2.3 to 1.4 and a factor of similar to 40 down the local universe. These empirical SFRs would cause galaxies to dramatically overgrow in mass if maintained all the way to low redshifts; we suggest that this does not happen because star formation is progressively quenched, likely starting from the most massive galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据