4.7 Article

IDENTIFICATIONS OF FIVE INTEGRAL SOURCES VIA OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 698, 期 1, 页码 502-508

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/502

关键词

galaxies: Seyfert; novae, cataclysmic variables; techniques: spectroscopic; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individual (IGR J16426+6536, IGR J18214-1318, IGR J18308-1232, IGR J19267+1325, IGR J22292+6647)

资金

  1. Chandra X-Ray Observatory Center [G07-8050X, G08-9055X]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), [NAS8-03060]
  3. UC Berkeley Chancellor's Fellowship
  4. SSL Summer Science Fellowship
  5. TUBITAK
  6. Turkish National Academy of Sciences Young and Successful Scientist
  7. European Commission FP 6 Marie Curie Transfer of Knowledge [MTKD-2006-42722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) is discovering hundreds of new hard X-ray sources, many of which remain unidentified. We report on optical spectroscopy of five such sources for which X-ray observations at lower energies (similar to 0.5-10 keV) and higher angular resolutions than INTEGRAL have allowed for unique optical counterparts to be located. We find that INTEGRAL Gamma-Ray (IGR) J16426+6536 and IGR J22292+6647 are Type 1 Seyfert active galactic nuclei (with IGR J16426+6536 further classified as a Seyfert 1.5) which have redshifts of z = 0.323 and z = 0.113, respectively. IGR J18308-1232 is identified as a cataclysmic variable (CV), and we confirm a previous identification of IGR J19267+1325 as a magnetic CV. IGR J18214-1318 is identified as an obscured high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB), which are systems thought to have a compact object embedded in the stellar wind of a massive star. We combine Chandra fluxes with distances based on the optical observations to calculate X-ray luminosities of the HMXB and CVs, finding L0.3-10 (keV) = 5 x 10(36) erg s(-1) for IGR J18214-1318, L0.3-10 keV = 1.3 x 10(32) erg s(-1) for IGR J18308-1232, and L0.3-10 keV = 6.7 x 10(32) erg s(-1) for IGR J19267+1325.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据